The I Index

Different: Gender Through the Eyes of a Primatologist

Next in the queue

58

/100

I Index Overall Rating

Readers

68/100

Critics

15/100

Scholars

91/100

Author:

Frans de Waal

Publisher:

W. W. Norton & Company

Date:

April 5, 2022

Primatologist Frans de Waal draws on decades of observation and studies of both human and animal behavior to argue that despite the linkage between gender and biological sex, biology does not automatically support the traditional gender roles in human societies. While humans and other primates do share some behavioral differences, biology offers no justification for existing gender inequalities. Using chimpanzees and bonobos to illustrate this point—two ape relatives that are genetically equally close to humans—de Waal challenges widely held beliefs about masculinity and femininity, and common assumptions about authority, leadership, cooperation, competition, filial bonds, and sexual behavior. Chimpanzees are male-dominated and violent, while bonobos are female-dominated and peaceful. In both species, political power needs to be distinguished from physical dominance. Power is not limited to the males, and both sexes show true leadership capacities.

What The Reviewers Say

Carl Zimmer,
New York Times Book Review
The primate tales that de Waal uses to discuss gender are both fascinating and enlightening.
Tamra Mendelson,
Washington Post
De Waal turns again to the ape world, this time to explore the connection between gender and biology. As I said, brave. Whether he’s convincing is another matter.
S.C. CORNELL,
LIBER
There are readers who will walk away from this text more sympathetic to homosexuality and gender fluidity in humans and more open to the idea that women can be powerful and men can be nurturing. Amid the hypermisogynistic conclusions of most pop-evolution pundits, this is not nothing; I could imagine Different as a useful if mild prophylactic against, say, Jordan Peterson. But to be seduced by essentialism, and especially zoological essentialism, would be a mistake for feminists.
Paul R. Abramson,
The Los Angeles Review of Books
A game-changer, potentially no less significant to the field than Foucault’s The History of Sexuality, but in a noncanonical fashion, and void of the usual tropes.